Research Article
Reduction of Routing Overhead in Wireless Sensor Network with Modified AODV-TP (Constant Packet Size)
|
Communications on Applied Electronics
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
|
| Volume 3 - Issue 8 |
| Published: December 2015 |
| Authors: Rubaina Takhi |
10.5120/cae2015652002
|
Rubaina Takhi . Reduction of Routing Overhead in Wireless Sensor Network with Modified AODV-TP (Constant Packet Size). Communications on Applied Electronics. 3, 8 (December 2015), 1-4. DOI=10.5120/cae2015652002
@article{ 10.5120/cae2015652002,
author = { Rubaina Takhi },
title = { Reduction of Routing Overhead in Wireless Sensor Network with Modified AODV-TP (Constant Packet Size) },
journal = { Communications on Applied Electronics },
year = { 2015 },
volume = { 3 },
number = { 8 },
pages = { 1-4 },
doi = { 10.5120/cae2015652002 },
publisher = { Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA }
}
%0 Journal Article
%D 2015
%A Rubaina Takhi
%T Reduction of Routing Overhead in Wireless Sensor Network with Modified AODV-TP (Constant Packet Size)%T
%J Communications on Applied Electronics
%V 3
%N 8
%P 1-4
%R 10.5120/cae2015652002
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract
Power management is essential in Wireless Sensor Network because the nodes are very small in size having a small battery and that too of limited life. The routing algorithms for it should satisfy the features of optimization of energy consumption. Ad hoc On Demand Distance Vector routing protocol has been modified, this algorithm has been analyzed named as modified AODV-TP (Threshold Power) and is highlighted in detail. The theme is that only those nodes are chosen as neighbors of nodes during RREQ (Route Request) phase that are directed towards destination. Also, threshold is set for all the nodes. If the power of the node is less than threshold, it will not acknowledge Route Reply (RREP) packet. The alternate route with second lowest minimum distance will be selected to forward the packet. The comparison is done between two protocols in terms of routing overhead and average remaining energy of nodes and delay with variation in packet. The proposed algorithm turns out to be better in terms of power conservation.
References
- A. Mainwaring, D. Culler, J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, and J.Anderson, “Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring,” ACM International Workshop Wireless Sensor Network Application, 2002, pp. 88–97
- S. Kim, S. Pakzad, D. Culler, J. Demmel, G. Fenves,S.Glaser, and M. Turon, “Health monitoring of civil infrastructures using wireless sensor networks,” 6th International Conference on Information Procesing in Sensor Networks, New York, 2007, pp. 254–263.
- I. Stoianov, L. Nachman, S. Madden, and T. Tokmouline, “Pipenet: A wireless sensor network for pipeline monitoring,” 6th International Conference on Information Procesing in Sensor Networks, New York,, 2007, pp. 264–273
- A. Camilli, C. E. Cugnasca, A. M. Saraiva, A. R. Hirakawa, and P. L. P. Correa, “From wireless sensors to field mapping: Anatomy of an application for precision agriculture,” Computer and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 58, Issue 1, 2007, pp. 25–36
- C. Perkins, E. Royer, “Ad-Hoc On Demand Distance Vector Routing,” the second IEEE workshops on Mobile Computer Systems and Applications, 1999, pp. 90-100
- Marina, M. K., Das S, R.; “On Demand multi-path Distance Vector Routing in Ad hoc network,”IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols, 2001, pp.14-23
- Seema Verma , Pinki Nayak and Rekha Agarwal “Energy Efficient Routing in Mobile Adhoc Networks based on AODV Protocol” International Journal of Computer Science Issues, Vol. 9, Issue 6, No 2, November 2012,pp.344-349
- P Samundiswary and S.R. Anandkumar,” Throughput Analysis of Energy Aware Reactive Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks,” International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering), ISSN: 2231-2307, Volume-2,Issue 1, March 2012, pp.497-500
Index Terms
Keywords